Paper detail

On the detectability of gravitational waves from primordial black holes orbiting Sgr A*

In this work we characterize the expected gravitational wave signal detectable by the planned space-borne interferometer LISA and the proposed next generation space-borne interferometer $μ$Ares arising from a population of primordial black holes orbiting Sgr A*, the super-massive black hole at the Galactic center. Assuming that such objects indeed form the entire diffuse mass allowed by the observed orbit of S2 in the Galactic center, under the simplified assumption of circular orbits and monochromatic mass function, we assess the expected signal in gravitational waves, either from resolved and non-resolved sources. We estimate a small but non negligible chance of $\simeq$ 10% of detecting one single 1 M$_{\odot}$ primordial black hole with LISA in a 10-year-long data stream, while the background signal due to unresolved sources would essentially elude any reasonable chance of detection. On the contrary, $μ$Ares, with a $\simeq$ 3 orders-of-magnitude better sensitivity at $\simeq$ 10$^{-5}$ Hz, would be able to resolve $\simeq$ 140 solar mass primordial black holes in the same amount of time, while the unresolved background should be observable with an integrated signal-to-noise ratio $\gtrsim$ 100. Allowing the typical PBH mass to be in the range 0.01-10 M$_{\odot}$ would increase LISA chance of detection to $\simeq$ 40% towards the lower limit of the mass spectrum. In the case of $μ$Ares, instead, we find a "sweet spot" just about 1 M$_{\odot}$, a mass for which the number of resolvable events is indeed maximized.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.