Paper detail

On the derivation representation of the fundamental Lie algebra of mixed elliptic motives

Richard Hain and Makoto Matsumoto constructed a category of universal mixed elliptic motives, and described the fundamental Lie algebra of this category: it is a semi-direct product of the fundamental Lie algebra Lie$\,π_1(MTM)$ of the category of mixed Tate motives over ${\bf Z}$ with a filtered and graded Lie algebra $u$. This Lie algebra, and in particular the subspace $u$, admits a representation as derivations of the free Lie algebra on two generators. In this paper we study the image $E$ of this representation of $u$, starting from some results by Aaron Pollack, who determined all the relations in a certain filtered quotient of $E$, and gave several examples of relations in low weights in $E$ that are connected to period polynomials of cusp forms on $SL_2({\bf Z})$. Pollack's examples lead to a conjecture on the existence of such relations in all depths and all weights, that we state in this article and prove in depth 3 in all weights. The proof follows quite naturally from Ecalle's theory moulds, to which we give a brief introduction. We prove two useful general theorems on moulds in the appendices.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.