Paper detail

On the derivation of mean-field percolation critical exponents from the triangle condition

We give a new derivation of mean-field percolation critical behaviour from the triangle condition that is quantitatively much better than previous proofs when the triangle diagram $\nabla_{p_c}$ is large. In contrast to earlier methods, our approach continues to yield bounds of reasonable order when the triangle diagram $\nabla_p$ is unbounded but diverges slowly as $p \uparrow p_c$, as is expected to occur in percolation on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ at the upper-critical dimension $d=6$. Indeed, we show in particular that if the triangle diagram diverges polylogarithmically as $p \uparrow p_c$ then mean-field critical behaviour holds to within a polylogarithmic factor. We apply the methods we develop to deduce that for long-range percolation on the hierarchical lattice, mean-field critical behaviour holds to within polylogarithmic factors at the upper-critical dimension. As part of the proof, we introduce a new method for comparing diagrammatic sums on general transitive graphs that may be of independent interest.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.