Paper detail

On the derivation of dynamical masses of the stellar clusters in the circumnuclear region of NGC2903

(Abridged) Gas and star velocity dispersions have been derived for four circumnuclear star-forming regions (CNSFRs) and the nucleus of the spiral galaxy NGC2903 using high resolution spectroscopy in the blue and far red. Stellar velocity dispersions have been obtained from the CaII triplet (CaT) lines at 8494, 8542, 8662A, using cross-correlation techniques while gas velocity dispersions have been measured by Gaussian fits to the Hbeta line. The CNSFRs, with sizes of about 100 to 150pc in diameter, show a complex structure at the Hubble Space Telescope resolution, with a good number of subclusters with linear diameters between 3 and 8pc. Their stellar velocity dispersions range from 39 to 67 km/s. These values, together with the sizes measured on archival HST images yield upper limits to the dynamical masses for the individual star clusters between 1.8 and 8.7 x 10$^6$ M$_\odot$ and upper limits to the masses for the whole CNSFR between 4.9 x 10$^6$ and 4.3 x 10$^7$ M$_\odot$. ...

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.