Paper detail

On the dependence structure and quality of scrambled $(t,m,s)-$nets

In this paper we develop a framework to study the dependence structure of scrambled $(t,m,s)$-nets. It relies on values denoted by $C_b(\mathbf{k};P_n)$, which are related to how many distinct pairs of points from $P_n$ lie in the same elementary $\mathbf{k}-$interval in base $b$. These values quantify the equidistribution properties of $P_n$ in a more informative way than the parameter $t$. They also play a key role in determining if a scrambled set $\tilde{P}_n$ is negative lower orthant dependent (NLOD). Indeed this property holds if and only if $C_b(\mathbf{k};P_n) \le 1$ for all $\mathbf{k} \in \mathbb{N}^s$, which in turn implies that a scrambled digital $(t,m,s)-$net in base $b$ is NLOD if and only if $t=0$. Through numerical examples we demonstrate that these $C_b(\mathbf{k};P_n)$ values are a powerful tool to compare the quality of different $(t,m,s)$-nets, and to enhance our understanding of how scrambling can improve the quality of deterministic point sets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.