Paper detail

On the dependence of the existence of the positive steady states on the rate coefficients for deficiency-one mass action systems: single linkage class

The Deficiency-One Theorem states that there exists a unique positive steady state in each positive stoichiometric class for weakly reversible deficiency-one mass action systems with one linkage class (regardless of the values of the rate coefficients). The non-emptiness of the set of positive steady states does not remain valid if we omit the weak reversibility. A recently published paper provided an equivalent condition to the existence of a positive steady state for deficiency-one mass action systems that are not weakly reversible, but still has only one linkage class. Based on that result, we characterise in this paper those of these mass action systems for which the non-emptiness of the set of positive steady states holds regardless of the values of the rate coefficients. Also, we provide an equivalent condition to the existence of rate coefficients such that the set of positive steady states is nonempty for the resulting mass action system.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.