Paper detail

On the dependence of spectroscopic indices of early-type galaxies on age, metallicity and velocity dispersion

We investigate the Mg-sigma and <Fe>-sigma relations in a sample of 72 early-type galaxies drawn mostly from cluster and group environments using a homogeneous data-set which is well-calibrated onto the Lick/IDS system. The small intrinsic scatter in Mg at a given sigma gives upper limits on the spread in age and metallicity of 49% and 32% respectively, if the spread is attributed to one quantity only and if the variations in age and metallicity are uncorrelated. The age/metallicity distribution as inferred from the Hbeta vs <Fe> diagnostic diagram reinforces this conclusion, as we find mostly galaxies with large luminosity weighted ages spanning a range in metallicity. In our sample we do not find significant evidence for an anti-correlation of ages and metallicities which would keep the index-sigma relations tight while hiding a large spread in age and metallicity. As a result of correlated errors in the age-metallicity plane, a mild age-metallicity anti-correlation cannot be completely ruled out given the current data. Correcting the line-strengths indices for non-solar abundance ratios following the recent paper by Trager et al., leads to higher mean metallicity and slightly younger age estimates while preserving the metallicity sequence. The [Mg/Fe] ratio is mildly correlated with the central velocity dispersion and ranges from [Mg/Fe]=0.05 to 0.3 for galaxies with sigma > 100 km/s. Under the assumption that there is no age gradient along the index-sigma relations, the abundance-ratio corrected Mg-sigma, <Fe>-sigma and Hbeta-sigma relations give consistent estimates of Delta [M/H]/ Delta log sigma = 0.9 (+- 0.1). The slope of the Hbeta-sigma relation limits a potential age trend as a function of sigma to 2-3 Gyrs along the sequence.(abriged)

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.