Paper detail

On the Density Probability Function of Galactic Gas. I. Numerical Simulations and the Significance of the Polytropic Index

We investigate the form of the one-point probability distribution function (pdf) for the density field of the interstellar medium using numerical simulations that successively reduce the number of physical processes included. Two-dimensional simulations of self-gravitating supersonic MHD and hydrodynamic turbulence, and of decaying Burgers turbulence, produce in all cases filamentary density structures and a power-law density pdf with logarithmic slope around -1.7. This suggests that the functional form of the pdf and the general filamentary morphology are the signature of the nonlinear advection operator. These results do not support previous claims that the pdf is lognormal. A series of 1D simulations of forced supersonic polytropic turbulence is used to resolve the discrepancy. They suggest that the pdf is lognormal only for effective polytropic indices $γ=1$ (or nearly lognormal for $γ\not=1$ if the Mach number is sufficiently small), while power laws develop at high densities if $γ<1$. We evaluate the polytropic index for conditions relevant to the cool interstellar medium using published cooling functions and different heating sources, finding that a lognormal pdf may occur at densities between 10$^3$ and at least 10$^4$ cm$^{-3}$. Several applications are examined. First, we question a recent derivation of the IMF from the density pdf by Padoan, Nordlund & Jones because a) the pdf does not contain spatial information, and b) their derivation produces the most massive stars in the voids of the density distribution. Second, we illustrate how a distribution of ambient densities can alter the predicted form of the size distribution of expanding shells. Finally, a brief comparison is made with the density pdfs found in cosmological simulations.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.