Paper detail

On the degeneracy of the tidal Love number k2 in multi-layer planetary models: application to Saturn and GJ436b

In order to accurately model giant planets, a whole set of observational constraints is needed. As the conventional constraints for extrasolar planets like mass, radius, and temperature allow for a large number of acceptable models, a new planetary parameter is desirable in order to further constrain planetary models. Such a parameter may be the tidal Love number k2. In this paper we aim to study the capability of k2 to reveal further information about the interior structure of a planet. With theoretical planetary models we investigate how the tidal Love number k2 responds to the internal density distribution of a planet. In particular, we demonstrate the effect of the degeneracy of k2 due to a density discontinuity in the envelope of a three-layer planetary model. The effect of a possible outer density discontinuity masks the effect of the core mass on the Love number k2. Hence, there is no unique relationship between the Love number k2 and the core mass of a planet. We show that the degeneracy of k2 with respect to a layer boundary in the envelope also occurs in existing planets, e.g. Saturn and the Hot Neptune GJ436b. As a result of the degeneracy, the planetary parameter k2 cannot be used to further constrain Saturnian models and for GJ436b only a maximum possible core mass can be derived from a given k2. To significantly narrow the uncertainty about the core mass of GJ436b the combined knowledge of k2 and atmospheric metallicity and temperature profile is necessary.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.