Paper detail

On the definition of spacetimes in Noncommutative Geometry, part II

In this second part of the paper, we define spectral spacetimes, a noncommutative generalization of Lorentzian orientable spacetimes of even dimension with a spin structure. There are two main differences with spectral triples: the existence of time-orientation 1-forms and the non-existence of a distinguished C*-structure on the algebra. If a "reconstructibility condition" is met, different, yet isomorphic, C*-structures exist. We define a natural notion of stable causality for spectral spacetimes. We give an example of a commutative spectral spacetime which is a Wick rotated version of the spectral triple that must be used in order to recover the usual notion of distance on a finite graph through Connes' distance formula. We show that this spectral spacetime is stably causal iff the time-orientation form induces no cycle. We also provide a noncommutative example, the split Dirac structure, which we study in some details. This structure is defined thanks to a discrete spinor bundle on a finite graph, a discrete connection, and operators at the vertices playing the role of gamma matrices. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the split Dirac structure to be a spectral spacetime. These includes the natural analogues of the properties defining a spin connection in the continuous case. However the split Dirac structure is not always reconstructible: we prove that this is the case exactly when there exists a parallel timelike vector field on the graph. Nonreconstructible split Dirac structures furnish examples of spectral spacetimes which are not Wick rotations of usual spectral triples, and are thus genuinely Lorentzian. Moreover we show that the Dirac operator of the split Dirac structure is related to a Lorentzian version of a discretization of the Dirac operator introduced earlier by Marcolli and van Suijlekom.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.