Paper detail

On the Decidability and Complexity of Some Fragments of Metric Temporal Logic

Metric Temporal Logic, $\mtlfull$ is amongst the most studied real-time logics. It exhibits considerable diversity in expressiveness and decidability properties based on the permitted set of modalities and the nature of time interval constraints $I$. \oomit{The classical results of Alur and Henzinger showed that $\mtlfull$ is undecidable where as $\mitl$ which uses only non-singular intervals $NS$ is decidable. In a surprizing result, Ouaknine and Worrell showed that the satisfiability of $\mtl$ is decidable over finite pointwise models, albeit with NPR decision complexity, whereas it remains undecidable for infinite pointwise models or for continuous time.} In this paper, we sharpen the decidability results by showing that the satisfiability of $\mtlsns$ (where $NS$ denotes non-singular intervals) is also decidable over finite pointwise strictly monotonic time. We give a satisfiability preserving reduction from the logic $\mtlsns$ to decidable logic $\mtl$ of Ouaknine and Worrell using the technique of temporal projections. We also investigate the decidability of unary fragment $\mtlfullunary$ (a question posed by A. Rabinovich) and show that $\mtlfut$ over continuous time as well as $\mtlfullunary$ over finite pointwise time are both undecidable. Moreover, $\mathsf{MTL}^{pw}[\fut_I]$ over finite pointwise models already has NPR lower bound for satisfiability checking. We also compare the expressive powers of some of these fragments using the technique of EF games for $\mathsf{MTL}$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.