Paper detail

On the $d$-Claw Vertex Deletion Problem

Let $d$-claw (or $d$-star) stand for $K_{1,d}$, the complete bipartite graph with 1 and $d\ge 1$ vertices on each part. The $d$-claw vertex deletion problem, $d$-CLAW-VD, asks for a given graph $G$ and an integer $k$ if one can delete at most $k$ vertices from $G$ such that the resulting graph has no $d$-claw as an induced subgraph. Thus, 1-CLAW-VD and 2-CLAW-VD are just the famous VERTEX COVER problem and the CLUSTER VERTEX DELETION problem, respectively. In this paper, we strengthen a hardness result in [M. Yannakakis, Node-Deletion Problems on Bipartite Graphs, SIAM J. Comput. (1981)], by showing that CLUSTER VERTEX DELETION remains NP-complete when restricted to bipartite graphs of maximum degree 3. Moreover, for every $d\ge 3$, we show that $d$-CLAW-VD is NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs of maximum degree $d$. These hardness results are optimal with respect to degree constraint. By extending the hardness result in [F. Bonomo-Braberman et al., Linear-Time Algorithms for Eliminating Claws in Graphs, COCOON 2020], we show that, for every $d\ge 3$, $d$-CLAW-VD is NP-complete even when restricted to split graphs without $(d+1)$-claws, and split graphs of diameter 2. On the positive side, we prove that $d$-CLAW-VD is polynomially solvable on what we call $d$-block graphs, a class properly contains all block graphs. This result extends the polynomial-time algorithm in [Y. Cao et al., Vertex deletion problems on chordal graphs, Theor. Comput. Sci. (2018)] for 2-CLAW-VD on block graphs to $d$-CLAW-VD for all $d\ge 2$ and improves the polynomial-time algorithm proposed by F. Bonomo-Brabeman et al. for (unweighted) 3-CLAW-VD on block graphs to 3-block graphs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.