Paper detail

On the cylindrically symmetric wormholes WhCR^e: The motion of test particles

In this article we partially implement the program outlined in the previous paper of the authors [A. V. Aminova and P. I. Chumarov, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044005 (2013)]. The program owes its origins to the following comment in paper [M. Cvetič and D. Youm, Nucl. Phys. B, 438, 182 (1995), Addendum-ibid. 449,146 (1995)], where a class of static spherically symmetric solutions in $(4+n)$-dimensional Kaluza--Klein theory was studied: "...We suspect that the same thing [as for spherical symmetry] will happen for axially symmetric stationary configurations, but it remains to be proven". We study the radial and non-radial motion of test particles in the cylindrically symmetric wormholes found in the authors'paper of type $\rm WhCR^e$ in 6-dimensional reduced Kaluza--Klein theory with Abelian gauge field and two dilaton fields, with particular attention to the extent to which the wormhole is traversable. In the case of non-radial motion along a hypersurface z=const we show that, as in the Kerr and Schwarzschild geometries, we should distinguish between orbits with impact parameters greater resp. less than a certain critical value $D_c$, which corresponds to the unstable circular orbit of radius $u_c$ $(r_c)$. For $D^2>D_c^2$ there are two kinds of orbits: orbits of the first kind arrive from infinity and have pericenter distances greater than $u_c$, whereas orbits of the second kind have apocenter distances less than $u_c$ and terminate at the singularity at $u=-\infty$ $(r=0)$. For $D=D_c$ orbits of the first and second kinds merge and both orbits spiral an infinite number of times toward the unstable circular orbit $u=u_c$. For $D^2<D_c^2$ we have only orbits of one kind: starting at infinity, they cross the wormhole throat and terminate at the singularity.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.