Paper detail

On the current failure -- but bright future -- of topology-driven biological network alignment

The function of a protein is defined by its interaction partners. Thus, topology-driven network alignment of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks of two species should uncover similar interaction patterns and allow identification of functionally similar proteins. Howver, few of the fifty or more algorithms for PPI network alignment have demonstrated a significant link between network topology and functional similarity, and none have recovered orthologs using network topology alone. We find that the major contributing factors to this failure are: (i) edge densities in current PPI networks are too low to expect topological network alignment to succeed; (ii) when edge densities are high enough, some measures of topological similarity easily uncover functionally similar proteins while others do not; and (iii) most network alignment algorithms fail to optimize their own topological objective functions, hampering their ability to use topology effectively. We demonstrate that SANA-the Simulated Annealing Network Aligner-significantly outperforms existing aligners at optimizing their own objective functions, even achieving near-optimal solutions when optimal solution is known. We offer the first demonstration of global network alignments based on topology alone that align functionally similar proteins with p-values in some cases below 1e-300. We predict that topological network alignment has a bright future as edge densities increase towards the value where good alignments become possible. We demonstrate that when enough common topology is present at high enough edge densities-for example in the recent, partly synthetic networks of the Integrated Interaction Database-topological network alignment easily recovers most orthologs, paving the way towards high-throughput functional prediction based on topology-driven network alignment.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.