Paper detail

On the critical line of 2+1 flavor QCD

We determine the curvature of the (pseudo)critical line of QCD with $n_f$=2+1 staggered fermions at nonzero temperature and quark density, by analytic continuation from imaginary chemical potentials. Monte Carlo simulations are performed adopting the HISQ/tree action discretization, as implemented in the code by the MILC collaboration, suitably modified to include a nonzero imaginary baryon chemical potential. We work on a line of constant physics, as determined in Ref.\cite{Bazavov:2011nk}, adjusting the couplings so as to keep the strange quark mass $m_s$ fixed at its physical value, with a light to strange mass ratio $m_l/m_s=1/20$. In the present investigation we set the chemical potential at the same value for the three quark species, $μ_l=μ_s\equiv μ$. We explore lattices of different spatial extensions, $16^3\times 6$ and $24^3\times 6$, to check for finite size effects, and present results on a $32^3 \times 8$ lattice, to check for finite cut-off effects. We discuss our results for the curvature $κ$ of the critical line at $μ= 0$, which indicate $κ=0.018(4)$, and compare them with previous lattice determinations by alternative methods and with experimental determinations of the freeze-out curve.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.