Paper detail

On the Cosmic Evolution of Fe/Mg in QSO Absorption Line Systems

We investigate the variation of the ratio of the equivalent widths of the FeII$λ$2600 line to the MgII$λλ$2796,2803 doublet as a function of redshift in a large sample of absorption lines drawn from the JHU-SDSS Absorption Line Catalog. We find that despite large scatter, the observed ratio shows a trend where the equivalent width ratio $\mathcal{R}\equiv W_{\rm FeII}/W_{\rm MgII}$ decreases monotonically with increasing redshift $z$ over the range $0.55 \le z \le 1.90$. Selecting the subset of absorbers where the signal-to-noise ratio of the MgII equivalent width $W_{\rm MgII}$ is $\ge$3 and modeling the equivalent width ratio distribution as a gaussian, we find that the mean of the gaussian distribution varies as $\mathcal{R}\propto (-0.045\pm0.005)z$. We discuss various possible reasons for the trend. A monotonic trend in the Fe/Mg abundance ratio is predicted by a simple model where the abundances of Mg and Fe in the absorbing clouds are assumed to be the result of supernova ejecta and where the cosmic evolution in the SNIa and core-collapse supernova rates is related to the cosmic star-formation rate. If the trend in $\mathcal{R}$ reflects the evolution in the abundances, then it is consistent with the predictions of the simple model.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.