Paper detail

On the convergence rates of Gauss and Clenshaw-Curtis quadrature for functions of limited regularity

We study the optimal general rate of convergence of the n-point quadrature rules of Gauss and Clenshaw-Curtis when applied to functions of limited regularity: if the Chebyshev coefficients decay at a rate O(n^{-s-1}) for some s > 0, Clenshaw-Curtis and Gauss quadrature inherit exactly this rate. The proof (for Gauss, if 0 < s < 2, there is numerical evidence only) is based on work of Curtis, Johnson, Riess, and Rabinowitz from the early 1970s and on a refined estimate for Gauss quadrature applied to Chebyshev polynomials due to Petras (1995). The convergence rate of both quadrature rules is up to one power of n better than polynomial best approximation; hence, the classical proof strategy that bounds the error of a quadrature rule with positive weights by polynomial best approximation is doomed to fail in establishing the optimal rate.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.