Paper detail

On the convective instability of hot radiative accretion flows

How many fraction of gas available at the outer boundary can finally fall onto the black hole is an important question. It determines the observational appearance of accretion flows, and is also related with the evolution of black hole mass and spin. Previous two-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations of hot accretion flows find that the flow is convectively unstable because of its inward increase of entropy. As a result, the mass accretion rate decreases inward, i.e., only a small fraction of accretion gas can fall onto the black hole, while the rest circulates in the convective eddies or lost in convective outflows. Radiation is usually neglected in these simulations. In many cases, however, radiative cooling is important. In the regime of the luminous hot accretion flow (LHAF), radiative cooling is even stronger than the viscous dissipation. In the one dimensional case, this implies that the inward increase of entropy will become slower or the entropy even decreases inward in the case of an LHAF. We therefore expect that convective instability becomes weaker or completely disappears when radiative cooling is important. To examine the validity of this expectation, in this paper we perform two-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations of hot accretion flows with strong radiative cooling. We find that compared to the case of negligible radiation, convection only becomes slightly weaker. Even an LHAF is still strongly convectively unstable, its radial profile of accretion rate correspondingly changes little. We find the reason is that the entropy still increases inward in the two-dimensional case.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.