Paper detail

On the contribution of active galactic nuclei to reionization (Research Note)

The electron scattering optical depth constraints on reionization suggest that there may be other sources that contribute to the ionization of hydrogen aside from observable star forming galaxies. Often the calculated value of the electron scattering optical depth, τ_{es}, falls below the measurements derived from observations of the CMB or an assumption about non-observable sources must be made in order to reach agreement. Here, we calculate the hydrogen ionization fraction as a function of redshift and the electron scattering optical depth from both galaxies and active galactic nuclei (AGN) factoring in the secondary collisional ionizations from the AGN X-ray emission. In this paper we use the most current determination of the evolving hard X-ray luminosity function and extrapolate its evolution beyond z = 6. The AGN spectral energy distributions (SEDs) include both UV and X-ray ionizing photons. To search for the largest possible effect, all AGN are assumed to have λ_{Edd} = 1.0 and be completely unobscured. The results show that AGNs produce a perturbative effect on the reionization of hydrogen and remains in agreement with current constraints. Our calculations find the epoch of reionization still ends at z \approx 6 and only increases the electron scattering optical depth by ~2.3% under the most optimal conditions. This can only be moderately increased by assuming a constant black hole mass of M_{BH} = 10^(5) solar masses. As a result, we conclude that there is a need for other sources beyond observable galaxies and AGNs that contribute to the reionization of hydrogen at z > 6.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.