Paper detail

On the consistency of the N=1 SYM spectra from wrapped five-branes

We discuss the existence of glueball states for N=1 SYM within the Maldacena-Nunez model. We find that for this model the existence of an area law in the Wilson loop operator does not imply the existence of a discrete glueball spectrum. We suggest that implementing the model with an upper hard cut-off can amend the lack of spectrum. As a result the model can be only interpreted in the infra-red region. A direct comparison with the lattice data allows us to fix the scale up to where the model is sensible to describe low-energy observables. Nevertheless, taking for granted the lattice results, the resulting spectrum does not follow the general trends found in other supergravity backgrounds. We further discuss the decoupling of the non-singlet Kaluza-Klein states by analysing the associated supergravity equation of motion. The inclusion of non-commutative effects is also analysed and we find that leads to an enhancement on the value of the masses.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.