Paper detail

On the consistency of a class of R-symmetry gauged 6D N=(1,0) supergravities

R-symmetry gauged 6D (1,0) supergravities free from all local anomalies, with gauge groups $G\times G_R$ where $G_R$ is the R-symmetry group and $G$ is semisimple with rank greater than one, and which have no hypermultiplet singlets, are extremely rare. There are three such models known in which the gauge symmetry group is $G_1\times G_2 \times U(1)_R$ where the first two factors are $ \left(E_6/{\mathbb{Z}_3}\right) \times E_7$, $ G_2 \times E_7 $ and $F_4 \times Sp(9)$. These are models with single tensor multiplet, and hyperfermions in the $(1,912)$, $(14,56)$ and $(52,18)$ dimensional representations of $G_1\times G_2$, respectively. So far it is not known if these models follow from string theory. We highlight key properties of these theories, and examine constraints which may arise from the consistency of the quantization of anomaly coefficients formulated in their strongest form by Monnier and Moore. Assuming that the gauged models accommodate dyonic string excitations, we find that these constraints are satisfied only by the model with the $F_4 \times Sp(9)\times U(1)_R$ symmetry. We also discuss aspects of dyonic strings and potential caveats they may pose in applying the stated consistency conditions to the $R$-symmetry gauged models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.