Paper detail

On the Connectivity Preserving Minimum Cut Problem

In this paper, we study a generalization of the classical minimum cut prob- lem, called Connectivity Preserving Minimum Cut (CPMC) problem, which seeks a minimum cut to separate a pair (or pairs) of source and destination nodes and meanwhile ensure the connectivity between the source and its partner node(s). The CPMC problem is a rather powerful formulation for a set of problems and finds applications in many other areas, such as network security, image processing, data mining, pattern recognition, and machine learning. For this important problem, we consider two variants, connectiv- ity preserving minimum node cut (CPMNC) and connectivity preserving minimum edge cut (CPMEC). For CPMNC, we show that it cannot be ap- proximated within αlogn for some constant α unless P=NP, and cannot be approximated within any poly(logn) unless NP has quasi-polynomial time algorithms. The hardness results hold even for graphs with unit weight and bipartite graphs. Particularly, we show that polynomial time solutions exist for CPMEC in planar graphs and for CPMNC in some special planar graphs. The hardness of CPMEC in general graphs remains open, but the polynomial time algorithm in planar graphs still has important practical applications.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.