Paper detail

On the condition for the central caustic degeneracy of the planetary microlensing

It is shown that the linear approximation of the central caustic for the planetary ($q\ll1$) microlensing is valid if $|1-s|\gg q^{1/3}$ (where $q$ is the mass ratio and $s$ is the projected separation in the unit of the Einstein ring radius of the primary). The condition is also consistent with the requirement that the binary separation is far from those in the resonant binary regime resulting in a single six-cusp caustic. Given that the linear approximation of the caustic is invariant under $s\leftrightarrow s^{-1}$, the close/wide binary degeneracy observed under the same condition may be understood via the linear approximation of the central caustic. Finally it is argued that the local degeneracies of lensing features associated with caustic crossings can still persist in the planetary events even when $|1-s|\sim q^{1/3}$ although the overall caustic shape may not be degenerate at all.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.