Paper detail

On the Computation of Dipole Moments: A Recommendation on the Choice of the Basis Set and the Level of Theory

Together with experimental data, theoretically predicted dipole moments represent a valuable tool for different branches in the chemical and physical sciences. With the diversity of levels of theory and basis sets available, a reliable combination must be carefully chosen in order to achieve accurate predictions. In a recent publication (arXiv:1709.05075 [physics.chem-ph]), Hait and Head-Gordon took a first step in this regard by providing recommendations on the best density functionals suitable for these purposes. However, no extensive study has been performed to provide recommendations on the basis set choice. Here, we shed some light into this matter by evaluating the performance of 38 general-purpose basis sets of single up to triple zeta-quality, when coupled with nine different levels of theory, in the computation of dipole moments. The calculations were performed on a data set with 114 small molecules containing second- and third-row elements. We based our analysis in regularised root mean square errors (regularised RMSE) as this procedure ensures relative errors for ionic species and absolute errors for species with small dipole moment values. Our results indicate that the best compromise between accuracy and computational efficiency is achieved by performing the computations with an augmented double zeta-quality basis set (i.e. aug-pc-1, aug-pcseg-1, aug-cc-pVDZ) together with a hybrid functional (e.g. wB97X-V, SOGGA11-X). Augmented triple-zeta basis sets could enhance the accuracy of the computations, but the computational cost of introducing such a basis set is substantial compared with the small improvement provided. These findings also highlight the crucial role that augmentation of the basis set with diffuse functions on both hydrogen and non-hydrogen atoms plays in the computation of dipole moments.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.