Paper detail

On the Complexity of the Monte Carlo Method for Incremental PageRank

This note extends the analysis of incremental PageRank in [B. Bahmani, A. Chowdhury, and A. Goel. Fast Incremental and Personalized PageRank. VLDB 2011]. In that work, the authors prove a running time of $O(\frac{nR}{ε^2} \ln(m))$ to keep PageRank updated over $m$ edge arrivals in a graph with $n$ nodes when the algorithm stores $R$ random walks per node and the PageRank teleport probability is $ε$. To prove this running time, they assume that edges arrive in a random order, and leave it to future work to extend their running time guarantees to adversarial edge arrival. In this note, we show that the random edge order assumption is necessary by exhibiting a graph and adversarial edge arrival order in which the running time is $Ω\left(R n m^{\lg{\frac{3}{2}(1-ε)}}\right)$. More generally, for any integer $d \geq 2$, we construct a graph and adversarial edge order in which the running time is $Ω\left(R n m^{\log_d(H_d (1-ε))}\right)$, where $H_d$ is the $d$th harmonic number.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.