Paper detail

On the Complexity of Joint Subcarrier and Power Allocation for Multi-User OFDMA Systems

Consider a multi-user Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) system where multiple users share multiple discrete subcarriers, but at most one user is allowed to transmit power on each subcarrier. To adapt fast traffic and channel fluctuations and improve the spectrum efficiency, the system should have the ability to dynamically allocate subcarriers and power resources to users. Assuming perfect channel knowledge, two formulations for the joint subcarrier and power allocation problem are considered in this paper: the first is to minimize the total transmission power subject to quality of service constraints and the OFDMA constraint, and the second is to maximize some system utility function (including the sum-rate utility, the proportional fairness utility, the harmonic mean utility, and the min-rate utility) subject to the total transmission power constraint per user and the OFDMA constraint. In spite of the existence of various heuristics approaches, little is known about the computational complexity status of the above problem. This paper aims to fill this theoretical gap, i.e., characterizing the complexity of the joint subcarrier and power allocation problem for the multi-user OFDMA system. It is shown in this paper that both formulations of the joint subcarrier and power allocation problem are strongly NP-hard. The proof is based on a polynomial time transformation from the so-called 3-dimensional matching problem. Several subclasses of the problem which can be solved to global optimality or $ε$-global optimality in polynomial time are also identified. These complexity results suggest that there are not polynomial time algorithms which are able to solve the general joint subcarrier and power allocation problem to global optimality (unless P$=$NP), and determining an approximately optimal subcarrier and power allocation strategy is more realistic in practice.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.