Paper detail

On the Complexity of Exact Maximum-Likelihood Decoding for Asymptotically Good Low Density Parity Check Codes

Since the classical work of Berlekamp, McEliece and van Tilborg, it is well known that the problem of exact maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding of general linear codes is NP-hard. In this paper, we show that exact ML decoding of a classs of asymptotically good error correcting codes--expander codes, a special case of low density parity check (LDPC) codes--over binary symmetric channels (BSCs) is possible with an expected polynomial complexity. More precisely, for any bit-flipping probability, $p$, in a nontrivial range, there exists a rate region of non-zero support and a family of asymptotically good codes, whose error probability decays exponentially in coding length $n$, for which ML decoding is feasible in expected polynomial time. Furthermore, as $p$ approaches zero, this rate region approaches the channel capacity region. The result is based on the existence of polynomial-time suboptimal decoding algorithms that provide an ML certificate and the ability to compute the probability that the suboptimal decoder yields the ML solution. One such ML certificate decoder is the LP decoder of Feldman; we also propose a more efficient $O(n^2)$ algorithm based on the work of Sipser and Spielman and the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm. The results can be extended to AWGN channels and suggest that it may be feasible to eliminate the error floor phenomenon associated with message-passage decoding of LDPC codes in the high SNR regime. Finally, we observe that the argument of Berlekamp, McEliece and van Tilborg can be used to show that ML decoding of the considered class of codes constructed from LDPC codes with regular left degree, of which the considered expander codes are a special case, remains NP-hard; thus giving an interesting contrast between the worst-case and expected complexities.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.