Paper detail

On The Communication Complexity of Finding an (Approximate) Stable Marriage

In this paper, we consider the communication complexity of protocols that compute stable matchings. We work within the context of Gale and Shapley's original stable marriage problem\cite{GS62}: $n$ men and $n$ women each privately hold a total and strict ordering on all of the members of the opposite gender. They wish to collaborate in order to find a stable matching---a pairing of the men and women such that no unmatched pair mutually prefer each other to their assigned partners in the matching. We show that any communication protocol (deterministic, nondeterministic, or randomized) that correctly ouputs a stable matching requires $Ω(n^2)$ bits of communication. Thus, the original algorithm of Gale and Shapley is communication-optimal up to a logarithmic factor. We then introduce a "divorce metric" on the set of all matchings, which allows us to consider approximately stable matchings. We describe an efficient algorithm to compute the "distance to stability" of a given matching. We then show that even under the relaxed requirement that a protocol only yield an approximate stable matching, the $Ω(n^2)$ communication lower bound still holds.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.