Paper detail

On the Communication Complexity of Approximate Nash Equilibria

We study the problem of computing approximate Nash equilibria of bimatrix games, in a setting where players initially know their own payoffs but not the payoffs of the other player. In order for a solution of reasonable quality to be found, some amount of communication needs to take place between the players. We are interested in algorithms where the communication is substantially less than the contents of a payoff matrix, for example logarithmic in the size of the matrix. When the communication is polylogarithmic in the number of strategies n, we show how to obtain epsilon-approximate Nash equilibria for epsilon approximately 0.438, and for well-supported approximate equilibria we obtain epsilon approximately 0.732. For one-way communication we show that epsilon=1/2 is achievable, but no constant improvement over 1/2 is possible, even with unlimited one-way communication. For well-supported equilibria, no value of epsilon less than 1 is achievable with one-way communication. When the players do not communicate at all, epsilon-Nash equilibria can be obtained for epsilon=3/4, and we also give a lower bound of slightly more than 1/2 on the lowest constant epsilon achievable.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.