Paper detail

On the Combined Analysis of Muon Shower Size and Depth of Shower Maximum

The mass composition of ultra-high energy cosmic rays can be studied from the distributions of the depth of shower maximum and/or the muon shower size. Here, we study the dependence of the mean muon shower size on the depth of shower maximum in detail. Air showers induced by protons and iron nuclei were simulated with two models of hadronic interactions already tuned with LHC data (run I-II). The generated air showers were combined to obtain various types of mass composition of the primary beam. We investigated the shape of the functional dependence of the mean muon shower size on the depth of shower maximum and its dependency on the composition mixture. Fitting this dependence we can derive the primary fractions and the muon rescaling factor with a statistical uncertainty at a level of few percent. The difference between the reconstructed primary fractions is below 20% when different models are considered. The difference in the muon shower size between the two models was observed to be around 6%.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.