Paper detail

On the collisional disalignment of dust grains in illuminated and shaded regions of IC 63

Interstellar dust grain alignment causes polarization from UV to mm wavelengths, allowing the study of the geometry and strength of the magnetic field. Over last couple of decades observations and theory have led to the establishment of the Radiative Alignment Torque (RAT) mechanism as leading candidate to explain the effect. With a quantitatively well constrained theory, polarization can be used not only to study the interstellar magnetic field, but also the dust and other environmental parameters. Photo-dissociation Regions (PDRs), with their intense, anisotropic radiation fields, consequent rapid $\rm H_{2}$ formation, and high spatial density-contrast provide a rich environment for such studies. Here we discuss an expanded optical, NIR, and mm-wave study of the IC\,63 nebula, showing strong $\rm H_{2}$ formation-enhanced alignment and the first direct empirical evidence for disalignment due to gas-grain collisions using high-resolution $\rm HCO^{+}$(J=1-0) observations. We find that relative amount of polarization is marginally anti-correlated with column density of $\rm HCO^{+}$. However, separating the lines of sight of optical polarimetry into those behind, or in front of, a dense clump as seen from $γ$ Cas, the distribution separates into two well defined sets, with data corresponding to \enquote{shaded} gas having a shallower slope. This is expected if the decrease in polarization is caused by collisions since collisional disalignment rate is proportional to R$_C\propto n\sqrt{T}$. Ratios of the best-fit slopes for the \enquote{illuminated} and \enquote{shaded} samples of lines of sight agrees, within the uncertainties, with the square-root of the two-temperature H$_2$ excitation in the nebula seen by Thi et al. (2009).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.