Paper detail

On the Coherence of WMAP and Planck Temperature Maps

The recent data release of ESA's Planck mission together with earlier WMAP releases provide the first opportunity to compare high resolution full sky Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropy maps. To quantify the coherence of these maps beyond the power spectrum we introduce Generalized Phases, unit vectors in the (2l+1) dimensional representation spaces. For a Gaussian distribution, Generalized Phases are random and if there is non-Gaussianity, they represent most of the non-Gaussian information. The alignment of these unit vectors from two maps can be characterized by their angle, 0 deg expected for full coherence, and 90 deg for random vectors. We analyze maps from both missions with the same mask and Nside=512 resolution, and compare both power spectra and Generalized Phases. We find excellent agreement of the Generalize Phases of Planck Smica map with that of the WMAP Q,V,W maps, rejecting the null hypothesis of no correlations at 5 sigma for l's l<700, l<900 and l<1100, respectively, except perhaps for l<10. Using foreground reduced maps for WMAP increases the phase coherence. The observed coherence angles can be explained with a simple assumption of Gaussianity and a WMAP noise model neglecting Planck noise, except for low-intermediate l's there is a slight, but significant off-set, depending on WMAP band. On the same scales WMAP power spectrum is about 2.6% higher at a very high significance, while at higher l's there appears to be no significant bias. Using our theoretical tools, we predict the phase alignment of Planck with a hypothetical perfect noiseless CMB experiment, finding decoherence at l > 2900; below this value Planck can be used most efficiently to constrain non-Gaussianity.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.