On the choosability with separation of planar graphs and its correspondence colouring analogue

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

A list assignment LL for a graph GG is an (ℓ,k)(\ell,k)-list assignment if ∣L(v)∣≥ℓ|L(v)|\geq \ell for each v∈V(G)v \in V(G) and ∣L(u)∩L(v)∣≤k|L(u) \cap L(v)| \leq k for each uv∈E(G)uv \in E(G). We say GG is (ℓ,k)(\ell,k)-choosable if it admits an LL-colouring for every (ℓ,k)(\ell, k)-list assignment LL. We prove that if GG is a planar graph with (4,2)(4,2)-list assignment LL and for every triangle T⊆GT \subseteq G we have that ∣⋂v∈V(T)L(v)∣≠2|\bigcap_{v \in V(T)} L(v)| \neq 2, then GG is LL-colourable. In fact, we prove a slightly stronger result: if GG contains a clique HH such that V(H)∩V(T)≠∅V(H) \cap V(T) \neq \emptyset for every triangle T⊆GT \subseteq G with ∣⋂v∈V(T)L(v)∣=2|\bigcap_{v \in V(T)} L(v)| = 2, then GG is LL-colourable. Additionally, we give a counterexample to the correspondence colouring analogue of (4,2)(4,2)-choosability for planar graphs.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.