Paper detail

On the causality of electrodynamics and the Aharonov-Bohm effect

This paper presents a \emph{non-instant field model} for electrodynamics that permits a causal explanation of the \emph{Aharonov-Bohm effect} and a \emph{covariant quantization} of the respective Maxwell equations via the \emph{Gupta-Bleuler method}. Our model satisfies the following \emph{correspondence principle}: if $A^μ$, $\vE$, $\vB$ denote the four potential, the electric field and the magnetic field of the non-instant field model, then the respective classical quantities are $\A[A^μ]$, $\A[\vE]$, $\A[\vB]$, where $\A$ is a covariant time averaging operator. Here $\A[A^μ]$ is interpreted as the best possible measurement of the four potential $A^μ$. Although the Lorentz condition is not satisfied for $A^μ$, it is satisfied for $\A[A^μ]$. The latter fact means that the Lorentz condition does not hold for the quantized field but for its expectation value (cf. \emph{Gupta-Bleuler method} of quantization). Finally, we derive the energy conservation law of our field model and show that the field energy is quantized.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.