Paper detail

On the Cauchy transform of weighted Bergman spaces

The problem of describing the range of a Bergman space B_2(G) under the Cauchy transform K for a Jordan domain G was solved by Napalkov (Jr) and Yulmukhametov. It turned out that K(B_2(G))=B_2^1(C\bar G) if and only if G is a quasidisk; here B_2^1(C\bar G) is the Dirichlet space of the complement of \bar G. The description of K(B_2(G)) for an integrable Jordan domain is given in [S. Merenkov, "On the Cauchy transform of the Bergman space", Mat. Fiz. Anal. Geom., 7 (2000), no. 1, 119-127]. In the present paper we give a description of K(B_2(G,ω)) analogous to the one given in [S. Merenkov, "On the Cauchy transform of the Bergman space", Mat. Fiz. Anal. Geom., 7 (2000), no. 1, 119-127] for a weighted Bergman space B_2(G,ω) with a weight ω which is constant on level lines of the Green function of G. In the case G=D, the unit disk, and under some additional conditions on the weight ω, K(B_2(D,ω))=B_2^1(C\bar{D}, ω^{-1}), a weighted analogue of a Dirichlet space.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.