Paper detail

On the cardinality and complexity of the set of codings for self-similar sets with positive Lebesgue measure

Let $λ_{1},\ldots,λ_{n}$ be real numbers in $(0,1)$ and $p_{1},\ldots,p_{n}$ be points in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$. Consider the collection of maps $f_{j}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} $ given by $$f_{j}(x)=λ_{j} x +(1-λ_{j})p_{j}.$$ It is a well known result that there exists a unique compact set $Λ\subset \mathbb{R}^{d}$ satisfying $Λ=\cup_{j=1}^{n} f_{j}(Λ).$ Each $x\in Λ$ has at least one coding, that is a sequence $(ε_{i})_{i=1}^{\infty}\in \{1,\ldots,n\}^{\mathbb{N}}$ that satisfies $\lim_{N\to\infty}f_{ε_{1}}\cdots f_{ε_{N}} (0)=x.$ We study the size and complexity of the set of codings of a generic $x\in Λ$ when $Λ$ has positive Lebesgue measure. In particular, we show that under certain natural conditions almost every $x\inΛ$ has a continuum of codings. We also show that almost every $x\inΛ$ has a universal coding. Our work makes no assumptions on the existence of holes in $Λ$ and improves upon existing results when it is assumed $Λ$ contains no holes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.