Paper detail

On the C and N Abundances of 47 Tucanae Main Sequence Stars

We report the results of an analysis of CN and CH band strengths among a large sample of 47 Tucanae main-sequence and turn-off stars presented earlier by Harbeck et al. The resulting C and N abundances derived from synthetic spectra demonstrate: 1) A strongly anti-correlated relationship between [C/Fe] and [N/Fe] with the CN-strong stars exhibiting depleted carbon and enhanced nitrogen. 2) The abundances of both elements agree remarkably well with those found among the evolved red giants of the cluster implying little change in surface abundances from at least Mv ~ +6.5 to the tip of the red giant branch. 3) The pattern of C-depletions and N-enhancements are quite similar to those seen among the turn-off stars of M71, a cluster of almost identical metallicity but lower central concentration and escape velocity. At the same time, similar if not smaller N-enhancements and larger C-depletions are evident among like stars in the more metal-poor cluster M5. We interpret these results, as did Harbeck et al., as evidence of the operation of some pollution/accretion event early in the cluster history - the most likely source being AGB ejecta. However, the present results rule out simple surface pollution and suggest that a substantial fraction of the present stars' masses must be involved.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.