Paper detail

On the buildup of massive early-type galaxies at z<~1. II- The coordinated key role of wet, mixed, and dry major mergers

Hierarchical models predict that present-day massive early-type galaxies (mETGs) have finished their assembly at a quite late cosmic epoch (z~0.5), conflicting directly with galaxy mass-downsizing. In Eliche-Moral et al. (2010), we presented a semi-analytical model that predicts the increase by a factor of ~2.5 observed in the number density of mETGs since z~1 to the present, just accounting for the effects of the major mergers strictly-reported by observations. Here, we describe the relative, coordinated role of wet, mixed, and dry major mergers in driving this assembly. Accordingly to observations, the model predicts that: 1) wet major mergers have controlled the mETGs buildup since z~1, although dry and mixed mergers have also contributed significantly to it; 2) the bulk of this assembly takes place during the ~1.4 Gyr time-period elapsed at 0.7<z<1, being nearly frozen at z<~0.7; 3) this frostbite can be explained just accounting for the observational decrease of the major merger fraction since z~0.7, implying that major mergers (and, in particular, dry events) have contributed negligibly to the mETGs assembly during the last ~6.3 Gyr; and 4) major mergers are responsible for doubling the stellar mass at the massive-end of the red sequence since z~1. The most striking model prediction is that at least ~87% of the mETGs existing at z~1 are not the passively-evolved, high-z counterparts of present-day mETGs, but their gas-poor progenitors instead. This implies that <~5% of present-day mETGs have been really in place since z~1. The model derives a redshift of final assembly for present-day mETGs in agreement with hierarchical models (z~0.5), reproducing at the same time the observed buildup of mETGs at z<~1.(Abridged)

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.