Paper detail

On the brightness distribution of Type Ia supernovae from violent white dwarf mergers

We investigate the brightness distribution expected for thermonuclear explosions that might result from the ignition of a detonation during the violent merger of white dwarf (WD) binaries. Determining their brightness distribution is critical for evaluating whether such an explosion model could be responsible for a significant fraction of the observed population of SNe Ia. We argue that the brightness of an explosion realized via the violent merger model is determined by the mass of nickel 56 produced in the detonation of the primary WD. We use a set of sub-Chandrasekhar mass WD detonation models to derive a relationship between primary WD mass and expected peak bolometric brightness. We use this relationship to convert the masses of merging primary WDs from binary population models to a predicted distribution of explosion brightness. We find a striking similarity between the shape of our theoretical peak-magnitude distribution and that observed for SNe Ia: our model produces a brightness distribution that roughly covers the range and matches the shape of the one observed for SNe Ia. However, this agreement hinges on a particular phase of mass accretion during binary evolution: the primary WD gains ~0.15-0.35 Msun from a slightly-evolved helium star companion. We also find that with high probability, violent WD mergers involving the most massive primaries (which should produce bright SNe) have delay times <500 Myr (Abridged).

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.