Paper detail

On the Bernstein-Hoeffding method

We show that the Bernstein-Hoeffding method can be employed to a larger class of generalized moments. This class includes the exponential moments whose properties play a key role in the proof of a well-known inequality of Wassily Hoeffding, for sums of independent and bounded random variables whose mean is assumed to be known. As a result we can generalise and improve upon this inequality. We show that Hoeffding's bound is optimal in a broader sense. Our approach allows to obtain "missing" factors in Hoeffding's inequality whose existence is motivated by the central limit theorem. The later result is a rather weaker version of a theorem that is due to Michel Talagrand. Using ideas from the theory of Bernstein polynomials, we show that the Bernstein-Hoeffding method can be adapted to case in which one has information on higher moments of the random variables. Moreover, we consider the performance of the method under additional information on the conditional distribution of the random variables and, finally, we show that the method reduces to Markov's inequality when employed to non-negative and unbounded random variables.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.