Paper detail

On the Bandstructure Velocity and Ballistic Current of Ultra Narrow Silicon Nanowire Transistors as a Function of Cross Section Size, Orientation and Bias

A 20 band sp3d5s* spin-orbit-coupled, semi-empirical, atomistic tight-binding (TB) model is used with a semi-classical, ballistic, field-effect-transistor (FET) model, to theoretically examine the bandstructure carrier velocity and ballistic current in silicon nanowire (NW) transistors. Infinitely long, uniform, cylindrical and rectangular NWs, of cross sectional diameters/sides ranging from 3nm to 12nm are considered. For a comprehensive analysis, n-type and p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS and PMOS) NWs in [100], [110] and [111] transport orientations are examined. In general, physical cross section reduction increases velocities, either by lifting the heavy mass valleys, or significantly changing the curvature of the bands. The carrier velocities of PMOS [110] and [111] NWs are a strong function of diameter, with the narrower D=3nm wires having twice the velocities of the D=12nm NWs. The velocity in the rest of the NW categories shows only minor diameter dependence. This behavior is explained through features in the electronic structure of the silicon host material. The ballistic current, on the other hand, shows the least sensitivity with cross section in the cases where the velocity has large variations. Since the carrier velocity is a measure of the effective mass and reflects on the channel mobility, these results can provide insight into the design of NW devices with enhanced performance and performance tolerant to structure geometry variations. In the case of ballistic transport in high performance devices, the [110] NWs are the ones with both high NMOS and PMOS performance, as well as low on-current variations with cross section geometry variations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.