Paper detail

On the Average Density of Galaxies

The properties of spatial distribution of luminous matter are investigated analysing all the available three dimensional catalogues of galaxies. In standard view, galaxies are believed to have a fractal distribution at small scale with a crossover to an homogeneous one at large scale. However up to now, the quantitative determination of this presumed homogeneity scale is still lacking. Contrary to such expectations, observational results show, in fact, a very inhomogeneous galaxy distribution. Some years ago we criticise the standard statistical approach and proposed a new one based on the concepts and methods of modern statistical analysis. The main result of new analysis is that, contrary to the conclusion of standard methods, the distribution of galaxies in the available samples, does not show any crossover to homogeneity, but has fractal correlations (with dimension $D \approx 2$) up to the limits of present three dimensional catalogs ($\approx 1000 h^{-1} Mpc$). The very first consequence of this result is that the standard approach is incorrect for all the length scale probed until now; moreover it calls for fascinating conceptual implication for the theoretical challenge in this field.

preprint1997arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.