Paper detail

On the asymptotic behavior of weakly lacunary series

Let $f$ be a measurable function satisfying $$f(x+1)=f(x), \qquad \int_0^1 f(x) dx=0, \qquad \textrm{Var} ~f < + \infty,$$ and let $(n_k)_{k\ge 1}$ be a sequence of integers satisfying $n_{k+1}/n_k \ge q >1$ $(k=1, 2, \ldots)$. By the classical theory of lacunary series, under suitable Diophantine conditions on $n_k$, $(f(n_kx))_{k\ge 1}$ satisfies the central limit theorem and the law of the iterated logarithm. These results extend for a class of subexponentially growing sequences $(n_k)_{k\ge 1}$ as well, but as Fukuyama (2009) showed, the behavior of $f(n_kx)$ is generally not permutation-invariant, e.g. a rearrangement of the sequence can ruin the CLT and LIL. In this paper we construct an infinite order Diophantine condition implying the permutation-invariant CLT and LIL without any growth conditions on $(n_k)_{k\ge 1}$ and show that the known finite order Diophantine conditions in the theory do not imply permutation-invariance even if $f(x)=\sin 2πx$ and $(n_k)_{k\ge 1}$ grows almost exponentially. Finally we prove that, in a suitable statistical sense, for almost all sequences $(n_k)_{k\ge 1}$ growing faster than polynomially, $(f(n_kx))_{k\ge 1}$ has permutation-invariant behavior.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.