Paper detail

On the association between core-collapse supernovae and HII regions

Previous studies of the location of core-collapse supernovae (ccSNe) in their host galaxies have variously claimed an association with HII regions; no association; or an association only with hydrogen-deficient ccSNe. Here, we examine the immediate environments of 39 ccSNe whose positions are well known in nearby (<15 Mpc), low inclination (<65 degrees) hosts using mostly archival, continuum-subtracted H-alpha ground-based imaging. We find that 11 out of 29 hydrogen-rich ccSNe are spatially associated with HII regions (38 +/- 11%), versus 7 out of 10 hydrogen-poor ccSNe (70 +/- 26%). Similar results from Anderson et al. led to an interpretation that the progenitors of type Ib/c ccSNe are more massive than those of type II ccSNe. Here, we quantify the luminosities of HII region either coincident with, or nearby to the ccSNe. Characteristic nebulae are long-lived (~20 Myr) giant HII regions rather than short-lived (~4 Myr) isolated, compact HII regions. Therefore, the absence of a HII region from most type II ccSNe merely reflects the longer lifetime of stars with <12 Msun than giant HII regions. Conversely, the association of a HII region with most type Ib/c ccSNe is due to the shorter lifetime of stars with >12 Msun stars than the duty cycle of giant HII regions. Therefore, we conclude that the observed association between certain ccSNe and HII provides only weak constraints upon their progenitor masses. Nevertheless, we do favour lower mass progenitors for two type Ib/c ccSNe that lackassociated nebular emission, a host cluster or a nearby giant HII region. Finally, we also reconsider the association between long Gamma Ray Bursts and the peak continuum light from their (mostly) dwarf hosts, and conclude that this is suggestive of very high mass progenitors, in common with previous studies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.