Paper detail

On the assembly of the Milky Way dwarf satellites and their common mass scale

We use a particle tagging technique to dynamically populate the N-body Via Lactea II high-resolution simulation with stars. The method is calibrated using the observed luminosity function of Milky Way satellites and the concentration of their stellar populations, and self-consistently follows the accretion and disruption of progenitor dwarfs and the build-up of the stellar halo in a cosmological "live host". Simple prescriptions for assigning stellar populations to collisionless particles are able to reproduce many properties of the observed Milky Way halo and its surviving dwarf satellites, like velocity dispersions, sizes, brightness profiles, metallicities, and spatial distribution. Our model predicts the existence of approximately 1,850 subhalos harboring "extremely faint" satellites (with mass-to-light ratios >5,000) lying beyond the Sloan Digital Sky Survey detection threshold. Of these, about 20 are "first galaxies", i.e. satellites that formed a stellar mass above 10 Msun before redshift 9. The ten most luminous satellites (L> 1e6 Lsun) in the simulation are hosted by subhalos with peak circular velocities today in the range V_max=10-40 km/s that have shed between 80% and 99% of their dark mass after being accreted at redshifts 1.7< z <4.6. The satellite maximum circular velocity and stellar line-of-sight velocity dispersion today follow the relation V_max=2.2 sigma_los. We apply a standard mass estimation algorithm based on Jeans modelling of the line-of-sight velocity dispersion profiles to the simulated dwarf spheroidals, and test the accuracy of this technique. The inner (within 300 pc) mass-luminosity relation for currently detectable satellites is nearly flat in our model, in qualitative agreement with the "common mass scale" found in Milky Way dwarfs. We do, however, predict a weak, but significant positive correlation for these objects: M_300 ~L^{0.088 \pm 0.024}.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.