Paper detail

On the Approximation of Functions with Line Singularities by Ridgelets

In [GO15], the authors discussed the existence of numerically feasible solvers for advection equations that run in optimal computational complexity. In this paper, we complete the last remaining requirement to achieve this goal - by showing that ridgelets, on which the solver is based, approximate functions with line singularities (which may appear as solutions to the advection equation) with the best possible approximation rate. Structurally, the proof resembles [Can01], where a similar result was proved for a different ridgelet construction, which is however not well-suited for use in a PDE solver (and in particular, not suitable for the CDD-schemes [CDD01] we are interested in). Due to the differences between the two ridgelet constructions, we have to deal with quite a different set of issues, but are also able to relax the (support) conditions on the function being approximated. Finally, the proof employs a new convolution-type estimate that could be of independent interest due to its sharpness.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.