Paper detail

On the application of 'photon+jet' process for setting the absolute scale of jet energy and determining the gluon distribution at the Tevatron in Run II

The consequences of application of new set of criteria, proposed in our previous works, for the improvement of a jet energy calibration accuracy with the process "p~p->photon+jet+X" at Tevatron and for a reduction of background events contribution are studied. The efficiencies of the used selection criteria are estimated. The distributions of these events over photon Pt and jet pseudorapidity are presented. The features of "photon+jet" events in the central calorimeter region of the D0 detector (|η|<0.7) are investigated. It is also shown that the samples of "photon+jet" events, selected with the cuts used for the jet energy calibration, may have the statistics sufficient for determining the gluon distribution function of a proton in the region of 2*10^{-3}< x < 1.0 and the values of Q^2 by one order higher than that reached in the experiments at HERA. Monte Carlo events produced by the PYTHIA 5.7 generator are used for this aim.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.