Paper detail

On the analysis of inexact augmented Lagrangian schemes for misspecified conic convex programs

We consider the misspecified optimization problem of minimizing a convex function $f(x;θ^*)$ in $x$ over a conic constraint set represented by $h(x;θ^*) \in \mathcal{K}$, where $θ^*$ is an unknown (or misspecified) vector of parameters, $\mathcal{K}$ is a closed convex cone and $h$ is affine in $x$. Suppose $θ^*$ is unavailable but may be learnt by a separate process that generates a sequence of estimators $θ_k$, each of which is an increasingly accurate approximation of $θ^*$. We develop a first-order inexact augmented Lagrangian (AL) scheme for computing an optimal solution $x^*$ corresponding to $θ^*$ while simultaneously learning $θ^*$. In particular, we derive rate statements for such schemes when the penalty parameter sequence is either constant or increasing, and derive bounds on the overall complexity in terms of proximal-gradient steps when AL subproblems are inexactly solved via an accelerated proximal-gradient scheme. Numerical results for a portfolio optimization problem with a misspecified covariance matrix suggest that these schemes perform well in practice while naive sequential schemes may perform poorly in comparison.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.