Paper detail

On the All-Speed Roe-type Scheme for Large Eddy Simulation of Homogeneous Decaying Turbulence

As the representative of the shock-capturing scheme, the Roe scheme fails to LES because important turbulent characteristics cannot be reproduced such as the famous k-5/3 spectral law owing to large numerical dissipation. In this paper, the Roe scheme is divided into five parts: , , , , and , which means basic upwind dissipation, pressure-difference-driven and velocity-difference-driven modification of the interface fluxes and pressure, respectively. Then, the role of each part on LES is investigated by homogeneous decaying turbulence. The results show that the parts , , and have little effect on LES. It is important especially for because it is necessary for computation stability. The large numerical dissipation is due to and , and each of them has much larger dissipation than SGS dissipation. According to these understanding, an improved all-speed LES-Roe scheme is proposed, which can give enough good LES results for even coarse grid resolution with usually adopted reconstruction.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.