Paper detail

On the algorithmic construction of the 1960 sectional complement

In 1960, G. Grätzer and E.\,T. Schmidt proved that every finite distributive lattice can be represented as the congruence lattice of a sectionally complemented finite lattice $L$. For $u \leq v$ in $L$, they constructed a sectional complement, which is now called the \emph{1960 sectional complement}. In 1999, G. Grätzer and E.\,T. Schmidt discovered a very simple way of constructing a sectional complement in the ideal lattice of a chopped lattice made up of two sectionally complemented finite lattices overlapping in only two elements -- the Atom Lemma. The question was raised whether this simple process can be generalized to an algorithm that finds the 1960 sectional complement. In 2006, G.~Grätzer and M. Roddy discovered such an algorithm -- allowing a wide latitude how it is carried out. In this paper we prove that the wide latitude apparent in the algorithm is deceptive: whichever way the algorithm is carried out, it~produces the same sectional complement. This solves, in fact, Problems 2 and 3 of the Grätzer-Roddy paper. Surprisingly, the unique sectional complement provided by the algorithm is the 1960 sectional complement, solving Problem 1 of the same paper.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.